Masthead header

The decline of Detroit

Detroit was my first taste of Americana, though I’ve never been there. For reasons I can only guess at, Saskatchewan received the 3 major US network feeds from Detroit. Why not Spokane (which Calgary gets), Minneapolis or Chicago (both closer)? Good question. But all Saskies know obscure Detroit suburb names like Lansing, Pontiac, and Auburn Hills.

As Saskatchewan doesn’t believe in Daylight Savings Time anymore (We were sick of being split down the middle, half with Alberta, half with Manitoba. Seriously. Nice try, William Willett.), eastern time zone tv shows were on 2 hours earlier in the winter. That meant that prime time started at 6pm, and Letterman was on at 9:30. It also meant that the 11:00 news was on at 9pm, early enough for young Fullertons to catch it before bedtime.

You now what was on Detroit’s late news in the late ’80’s? Death and destruction. It was not a happy time in the Motor City. Things like Devil’s Night (arsonists rampage the day before hallowe’en) and crack cocaine hysteria were reaching their peak. There were some positives: the Pistons were winning world championships, I became a lifelong Red Wings fan, and I acquired a taste for motown music. But what a picture of America to portray to impressionable prairie youth.

Detroit’s hayday is long past. The entire US Midwest has seen economic decline, as industry and investment move away from Chicago, Detroit (the Rust Belt) and Cincinatti to Atlanta, Phoenix and Houston (the Sun Belt). But Detroit’s fall has been particularly bad. Reasons for it include the flight to the suburbs, the decline of the american automotive industry, and racial tensions that resulted in de facto segregated neighborhoods (source).

Detroit is known for cars, of course. The rise of the Japanese automakers was very painful for the Big Three. Two movies come to mind: Gung Ho … One of many 80’s films that portrayed Japanese manufacturing culture. They were the threat back then. In my current career, Japanese Quality is the model of excellence, and all successful manufacturing operations have borrowed from their philosophies. The other is Roger and Me, Michael Moore’s first film about the decline of his home town Flint, Michigan, a victim of the automotive industry’s crash, and the people affected by heartless CEO’s.

The most fascinating thing for me about modern Detroit is the flight from the core. Detroit’s population has fallen from a peak of 1.8 million in the 50’s to under a million today. Affluent citizens have fled the core to those suburbs of Lansing, Pontiac and Auburn Hills, decimating Detoit’s tax base. Thousands of buildings lay vacant, and the city cannot afford to demolish them. They become havens for drugs and crime, helping Detroit become one of America’s most dangerous cities.

Things are so bad that there are serious proposals to raze entire blocks and let them go back to nature. Imagine farmland and wildlife inside a US beltway …

Finally, this abandonment has lead to a new pastime: urban exploration. There are fabulous skyscrapers in Detroit that have sat abandoned for years. People explore these buildings as they would a cave full of stalactites and stalagmites. Check out detroitblog.org for some fascinating photos of some beautiful abandoned buildings and insight into Detroit’s decline from a Detroiter.

Abuse of the system.

R-118BE5_th.jpg

I parked in a spot reserved for expectant mothers on the weekend. Ok I didn’t…but Dan did. I was simply the passenger and had no control of the situation. None.

The guilt I felt about prematurely parking in one of these spots faded quickly when I realized that I’ve never been able to find such rock star parking in the Ikea lot before. Not even close. In fact, instead of being one of those idiots that will waste time driving up and down every row in search of a spot that’s close enough, we usually choose save ourselves a few minutes (and loads of frustration) and park at the far end. So this was HUGE.

It seems being pregnant has some perks. Excellent.

July 27, 2006 - 7:50 am

Kris - Interesting. Kurtis and I actually had a fairly in-depth discussion about this the other day when we were stuck for a parking spot at Superstore (ugh). There was plenty of parking in the back of the lot…which is only about a KILOMETRE from the entrance, so we jokingly (or maybe not so jokingly) contemplated using one of the expectant mother spots. Which, I might add, hardly EVER have cars parked in them. Plus, how would they know? Are there expectant mother parking police that would come out of nowhere, usher me discretely into the bathroom and ask me to pee on a stick? My friend Deb didn’t show until she was 4 months along…but, as she was technically “expectant” in those first four months, was she any less worthy of a spot?

You go, girl. Work that belly. Or, soon-to-be belly, anyways. 😉

And P.S.: we found a regular spot by stalking people to their cars. Brilliant.

July 27, 2006 - 10:13 am

Shannen - I too asked myself what ‘expectant’ actually meant. Does it just mean pregnant, or at a certain point in the pregnancy? If so, but those numbers on the sign.

PARKING FOR PREGNANT LADIES – MONTHS 6-9.

Ok…slightly tacky, but I probably wouldn’t have parked there. Something for signmakers to think about.

July 27, 2006 - 10:42 am

Carole - I sometimes wonder the same thing about the ‘courtesy seating’ on the bus. When I was about 4 months pregnant and barely showing, Marty and I took a long bus ride to the former Corel Center to see John Mayer. We both stood the whole way, and I kept thinking ‘am I pregnant enough to ask someone for their seat?’. It seems so silly now that I would have even questioned it.

I only got to enjoy the ‘Expectant Mother’ parking for a short time, but it was great, so enjoy it Shan!

American beer = not crap

For pretty much my whole life, I’ve been lead to believe that all beer made in Canada is strong, delicious, and the envy of beermakers the world over. You know, “real beer for real men”, or some such nonsense. Conversely, American beer is weak, watery, tastes like bum, and only people who don’t like REAL beer would dare drink it.

I’ve come to realize that this is pretty much a total lie. Yes, Bud, Coors Light and the tragically ill-named Milwaukee’s Best are all terrible and fit the stereotype, but are Canadian and Blue really any better? Maybe slightly, but they’re pretty friggin far from being among the best beers in the world, despite what their slick ad campaigns might say. They really couldn’t be more generic – not terribly offensive, and you’ll drink one if there’s nothing else left in the fridge, but they have no redeeming qualities, and they’re excessively overpriced. It seems safe to say that for the most part, macrobrews are pretty crappy, regardless of the country of origin. There’s no craftsmanship. No taste. No love.

Surely then, Canadian microbrews must absolutely destroy their American counterparts in alcohol content, taste, and overall manliness, right? Again, not so. Stone Brewing, Sierra Nevada, New Belgium Brewing, Lake Placid Brewing and many other American microbreweries are currently making beer that is way, way better than anything made in Canada. Checking the “Top 100 Beers” list compiled by the beer nerds at beeradvocate.com reveals that just about all of the top beers in the world are either Belgian or American. The only Canadian brewery to even make the list is Quebec’s Unibroue (who excel at making Belgian-style beer).

Now, don’t get me wrong here – I enjoy a Lakeport Honey or a Bohemian as much as the next guy… but it isn’t really “good”, it’s just “not terrible”. Plus it costs $26.40 for 24 bottles, which is straight-up awesome. All I’m saying is, we really need to drop the arrogance about our beer-brewing prowess. It’s pretty much baseless, and somewhat embarassing.

So the next time you’re in the U.S., try a beer you’ve never heard of before – a Sierra Nevada Pale Ale, a Fat Tire, a Samuel Smith Oatmeal Stout or an Ubu Ale. You’ll likely be pleasantly surprised… at the very least, (in the words of Dave Chappelle) “it’ll get you drunk!”.

last 5 songs: “helicopters” – the stills; “stockholm syndrome” – muse; “retreat” – the rakes; “my wife” – the who; “chinese people” – jerry seinfeld

July 26, 2006 - 10:30 am

Shannen - Mark,

The safe post, but a post nonetheless. Welcome back.

😉

July 26, 2006 - 11:36 pm

Gary - I’m actually in N. California right now and I’ve managed to consume a few free Sierra nevada. The Pale Ale is their standard brew and really good. I’ve also had a couple Summerfest which are awesome but today I had a Bigfoot Ale. Now this beer is strong to the point of absurdness. It has 9.6% alcohol and it is basically wine-beer. I’m sure I could develop a taste for it but the most you could have in one night is 3, max. I’m not even joking.

FYI, if you come across a Sam Adams Cranberry Ale, run the other direction.

July 27, 2006 - 10:10 am

mark - heh – sorry Shan, I just can’t do it. thanks, though.

good work, Gary. SN Pale Ale is awesome. Bigfoot is a barley wine.

July 27, 2006 - 12:35 pm

dan - I like beer. Some beer more than others.

I like Canada. Some aspects more than others.

I like Canadian beer. Some more than others. But there are enough *excellent* Canadian beers (Big Rock Traditional, Creemore Springs Lager, Granville Island) that it forces me to question the bias of your source. The two brothers of beeradvocate.com hail from Boston, which is a) in the USA, and b) as close to belgium as you can get within the USA. Coincidence?

I haven’t tasted many of their top 100 (though I’ve tasted most of the more popular microbrews that both the Bay Area and Boston have to offer, thanks to my semi-frequent business travel to those two locales), and I look forward to trying some of their favourites. But the crux of my argument is: if they predominantly sample American beer, it is likely that their list will be mostly American beer.

We need some sort of intergalactic beer advocate, with no ties to any country. They could sample every beer from every microbrew on earth, and come up with a *real* top 100. Of course, they would compare everything they taste to their favourite beers back home on their planet Mxlplx, where, coincidentally, Bud is also a top seller.

July 27, 2006 - 12:46 pm

mark - The two guys who run beeradvocate.com aren’t the ones who come up with the list – the list is based on reviews from anyone who bothers to review them, and there are reviewers from everwhere (even the clocktower beers have been reviewed).

Also, the number 1 beer on their list can’t even be bought in the U.S. – it has to be purchased directly from the brewery in Belgium.

Anyway, here’s how they calculated the scores:

How was this list calculated?
The Best of BeerAdvocate (BA) lists are generated using statisical formulas that pull data from hundreds of thousands of user reviews. They are not hand-picked by any one person. The general formula uses a Bayesian estimate:

weighted rank (WR) = (v ÷ (v+m)) × R + (m ÷ (v+m)) × C

where:
R = review average for the beer
v = number of reviews for the beer
m = minimum reviews required to be listed (currently 43)
C = the mean across the list (currently 3.72)

The formula normalizes scores, that is pulls (R) to the mean (C) if the number of reviews is not well above (m). So if a beer has only a few reviews above (m), its (WR) is decreased a little if it is above the mean (C), or increased a little if it is below the mean (C) in accordance with the normal distribution rule of statistics.

Currently, a beer must have 5 or > reviews to be included in any calculations. And (m) is calculated by averaging the number of reviews for beers that have 5 or > reviews within the list being viewed, while (C) is the mean (average) overall score for all beers that have or > reviews within the list.

Example 1: (a beer with a 4.35 review average and 105 reviews)

(105 ÷ (105+43)) × 4.35 + (43 ÷ (105+43)) × 3.72 = 4.17 = WR

Example 2: (a beer with a 3.1 review average and 6 reviews)

(6 ÷ (6+43)) × 3.1 + (43 ÷ (6+43)) × 3.72 = 3.64 = WR

July 28, 2006 - 9:35 am

dan - Hmmm … mayhaps I should have looked into methodology before painting the brothers with the bias brush.

I stand corrected. And am now a member.

Once you move into Mechanicsville, we will have to have monthly beer sample nights at your new neighborhood pub.

All this talk of beer is making me thirsty. That and the pretzels.

July 29, 2006 - 10:31 pm

Gary - Since my last post, I’ve had a Fat Tire and a Chimay Yellow label. Fat Tire good. Chimay is out of this world. I probably couldn’t afford it if my work wasn’t paying. It’s a belgian beer and a suitable substitute for wine at a fancy dinner.

Funny enough it didn’t make the top 100. I rule that list null and void without it.

July 31, 2006 - 7:44 am

mark - Gary you fool, Chimay yellow’s non-inclusion in the list does not mean that the list is bad, it means that there are at least 100 beers that are better.

This should be cause for celebration, not disdain.

Dan and I will be having monthly quality meetings at Pub Italia. your presence is encouraged.

EDIT: actually, it looks like the yellow label Chimay hasn’t even been reviewed on the site yet.  Maybe it’s new?

August 2, 2006 - 9:03 am

Jessie - Mark, you should consider this rant a success! Everyone is talking about beer, and everyone is thirsty. Hell, it’s 10 am on a Wednesday morning and I am already dreaming about having a Munich Breakfast – consisting of a Hefeweizen, a pretzel and Weisswurst sausage with Bavarian mustard, mmmmm…

If you are really serious about taking beer appreciation to a new level as a group, then I would encourage you to make a stop in Peterborough the next time you are headed to the Toronto area. My good pal Roland owns a fabulous Belgian style bar and tap room with a fantastic selection of beer that includes some Ontario-only releases. And the food is, as Mark would say, DYNAMITE. For a surprisingly engaging read, as well as a tonne of links about beer, check out their website at http://www.stveronus.com

Bellyness.

belly.jpg
July 20, 2006 - 1:28 pm

Dean - something tells me you’ve seen, ‘You, Me, and Dupree.”
All this talk of taking a name and adding “ness” to the end. hmmmm…shan-ness. me like.

July 20, 2006 - 1:52 pm

Shannen - I haven’t actually. Is is worth seeing?

Maybe the folks at ‘You, me and Dupree’ got their *ness* from me. 😉 Likely…I’m a well known trend starter. Sort of.

July 25, 2006 - 7:19 am

dread pirate lindsay - thats my little (second) cousin in there! hehe. 😀